Living Heritage

Musing on House Museums

MUSING ON HOUSE MUSEUMS

Words by Kay Burns


The “house museum” is a particular type of museum in the realm of museology. Like most museums, the goal of the house museum is to preserve history. However, they can also differ from other museums such as those of natural history or art with their objects and objectives of preservation.

In an attempt to explore these premises and pitfalls, I explored through a book called Uses of Heritage by Laurajane Smith (2006); specifically, the 4th chapter, “The ‘Manored’ Past – The Banality of Grandiloquence” . Although the chapter focuses mainly on the British “Country House”, Smith’s research sheds light on the broader concept of house museums.  I was able to draw some perspectives on the idiosyncrasies of house museums in general, which has led to questions to consider as the Lougheed House Re-imagined project progresses.  

Interior Main Hall of Lougheed House | 2020 | Photography by Chris Stutz

One of the things Smith examines is the word “heritage.” She states: “a truth universally acknowledged [is] that heritage is intimately concerned with the expression, construction and representation of ‘identity’.”  We aspire to understand ourselves in some way represented within the heritage sites we visit, whether that representation is confirmation that we belong there, or proof that we don’t.   Why is it that we want to see how the elite has lived – a lifestyle not available to most people? Does the visitor who doesn’t see themselves in the museum interpret the site with awe or with some kind of disdain?  

Smith speaks of the idea of “heritage” as a doing rather than being, an action, not a place, or perhaps more simply, a verb not a noun. While re-imagining Lougheed House’s permanent exhibits, it is important to realize that history is a living, breathing entity; it is constantly changing and evolving as the world changes around us. If we only accept history as a static thing, then our exhibits have no meaning for our changing audiences. Looking back on a fixed representation of a moment in time tends to suggest “a past reconstructed as more gentle and elegant than the present [and more desirable?] – a sense of elegance apparently personified by the country house.”  

The notion of doing heritage also relates to questions of performing identities. Visitors are both audience and performer at heritage sites. Smith states: “The performativity of the visit is also about remembering – specifically about remembering your social place in English society.” She speaks about the country house as a ‘theatre of memory’ in which the performance of remembering is about the past but also about the creation of new memories on site.  

It is common for house museums to have formal gardens as part of them, which provide an introductory ambience prior to entering the home. Smith speaks of it as “expressing control over nature and a sense of social orderliness,” which sets the stage for “the inequities of the social relations between the different classes” that are further emphasized within the house itself. As they approach the site “Visitors may be invited to view the façade of the house and wander through the gardens and terraces that surround the house and imbibe the … delights of the botanical collections. They may enter the house, usually through a side, lower or trade entrance, which itself sends a message of social place and social exclusion…” Gardens are often spaces that all may enjoy, even if it is just from afar or walking by. In a modern era, visitors get the added experience of being able to enter the house, but we still do not get to enter through a grand main entrance as important visitors would have in the past. Even at Lougheed House, the front entrance is rarely used, and guests enter through a west side basement door. 

Black and White Photo of a Victorian garden party in Beaulieu Gardens at Lougheed House

Garden party at Beaulieu | c. 1900 | Glenbow Archives NA-3232-91

A photo of modern day Beaulieu Gardens with Lougheed House in the background

Lougheed House’s formal gardens | 2017

Many of the country homes in the UK and in the colonies represent wealth that had been “drawn from the brutalities of acquisition and commercial exploitation of British colonies. In addition, although it is not clear how many, a number of elite families and their wealth owe much to the British slave trade.”  

The lives of servants are not very often presented within house museums in anything more than in a perfunctory way at best. This is partially evident in the “lack of social commentary and the exclusion of working areas of houses on the visitors’ tour.” Smith indicates “these absences are typical of house museums generally and work to make women, servants, slaves and estate workers invisible, which excludes the house from the wider historical and contemporary social contexts in which it resides.” While our own servants’ spaces at Lougheed House are not shown due to liability and lack of accessibility rather than a wish to exclude any narrative that refers to the house’s servant history, the point is still relevant.

Lady Lougheed with her vehicle, chauffer and daughter in front of Lougheed House

Lady Lougheed and her daughter, Marjorie, with their chauffeur | c. 1911 | Glenbow Archives NA-3232-6

We are discovering the challenges of this in our research about the history of Lougheed House. It is almost impossible to find information about the people who lived on site as servants to the family. Even though one or two census documents (1901 and 1906) list some servants at the House, it is a challenge to find any further details. The next blog post will address the search for the histories of two of these Lougheed House servants, Mary and Jemima Blair.

  

Historic houses tend to promote feelings of “otherness”. Class distinctions evident historically are preserved through visitor engagement. Conservation practices and stories associated with house museums continue to elevate the prestige and class of the original owners to the loss of stories of those who served the family (servants, children’s nurses, carriage house staff, gardeners, etc.). How can this house speak to a larger history than the anticipated versions that perpetuate stories of privilege upon which it was built?   

Lougheed House | 2020 | Photography by Chris Stutz